Brother Fax 8000p Manual

Rest In Peace "We had proposed a law very similar to the one being challenged"

Taken from Network:

"To read the statements by the former Dalem Fabrizio Rondolino about the eavesdropping order under discussion in Parliament is a question, but those of the main opposition party there are or are they doing? Yes, because the former Print signing of not mince his words, and when his first say one thing and then do another, not so much for subtle.

Those of Pd, in fact, are ready to take to the streets to protest against the "law" gag. "behavior has always been consistent with the principles professed by the Democrats? Stains: " We had proposed a law very similar to the one being challenged ", writes Rondolino on The Front Page, the blog of political analysis edited together with another ex Dalem, Claudio Velardi.

What are you referring? To the PD program 2008, one signed by Walter Veltroni. Well, that program is a proposed law on wiretapping that fits "with a good approximation to the bill under discussion in parliament," says Rondolino. Clearer than that.

And to avoid misunderstandings, we publish below the paragraph 4.4 b) program of Pd ( text here full) entitled "interception, no violation of individual rights" . You be the judge yourself:

"The instrument of the interception of telephone communications, computer and data is essential to combat organized crime and bring to justice those who commit the crimes of the greatest social, such as pedophilia and corruption. We must reconcile these aims with fundamental rights such as information and the right to privacy and the protection of the person.
The absolute prohibition on publication of all documentation relating to interception and requests and orders issued in of a precautionary measure until the end of the preliminary hearing, and investigation , serves to protect the fundamental rights of the citizen and the same investigations, which are often compromised by the disclosure of improper pleadings.
E ' must identify in the public prosecutor responsible for the safekeeping of documents, drastically reducing the number of listening centers and determine criminal and administrative penalties much more stringent than the current to make them likely to be an effective deterrent to infringement of constitutionally protected rights. "

emphasizing the points that the proposals made in the Democratic Party election program coincide with those contained in the bill developed by the center, presenting the request made by the leaders of the center Rondolino: why the Democratic Party does not comply with the program and vote for the law?

And one might add, with a little 'of malice, but the center-left voters have never read the program of the Democratic Party?