of Andrea Amati - been years since we faced with the dogma of the meeting. 's one of those words that seem to rise to a higher rank, as if they were an expression of absolute value, which becomes inconvenient if not outrageous subject to criticism and raise doubt. It will be said, are just words, as the poet said, are just songs. But the pounding insistence with which the value expressed by this word is exalted, revered, exalted by the unanimous chorus of political correctness, making it unbearably disagreeable.
The word collusion hurts the camouflage with which it was introduced in the common language by the dominant political class. Its etymological meaning is that of concerted decision or the result of collaboration of all parties, as the elements of an orchestra in concert. In the political reality it consists in the agreement that the political parties to enter into government with representatives of private interests, the expression of "great powers" of society, in order to prevent their hostile reaction at government decisions that affect them. In fact it is a transgression of the strict principles of parliamentary democracy, in theory, reminds us Professor Sartoris paginme from the Courier (bottom of Sept. 6), were still in force in Italy. Parliamentary democracy requires that decisions affecting the life of the country are taken by a majority of a group of people, members of Parliament, what specifically elected by the general public. Regardless of the electoral system adopted, the Parliament is the expression of the national community, through the constraint representation of its members, and only at that meeting should take decisions affecting the generality of the citizen-voters.
With the so-called conciliation, however, problems are not just discussed (as it would certainly be acceptable) but also decided outside the halls of Parliament, directly between the representatives of special interests (employers, unions, banks, insurance companies, pharmacists, civil service unions, magistrates, lawyers, the inhabitants of the Susa Valley) and Representatives of political parties in government. Political parties have transformed, with clerical-Marxist logic, their organizational structures from free association to a kind of monastic Masonic brotherhood, where the defense of the power acquired precedence over any other value, even though they are theoretically protected by the Constitution. In this way, the political party leaders have taken an enormous power: any decision is made directly with the social groups from time time involved, regardless of the will of Parliament, and brought to Parliament only for formal ratification, imposed by the parliamentary leaders of their parties without being allowed any real critical contribution. Just for the sake of appearances, or merely for tactical requested by the parties, MPs pretend to discuss amongst themselves but in the end always vote in accordance with team orders, or order as the governing bodies of their own party. And they can not do otherwise if overdriven the party will not allow their re-election, with loss of all benefits and privileges that this entails. They also take the family. Isolated cases of parliamentarians who, in the recent past, have dared to show a little ' independence from their parties have been exposed to public ridicule, pointed at with scorn by the whole gang-Masonic monastic of Italian politics and the media, until they themselves have not made a public apology and returned to play the obedient to their well-paid role Members of keypads.
With the emergence of the meeting, the Parliament has become a mere votatoio, so that if they can, MPs go there as little as possible, making replacement of "pianists" who vote for them under the table: To vote as the party commands us you can do well to replace.
But consultation is not only degrades the constitutional role of Parliament, dismissed by their specific role representatives of the entire national community and, therefore, whether corporations, churches, lodges and even of the thighs, marginalizing the role of performers in order to vote, it humiliates, if not destroyed, the powers of the government, which would the task of leading the government. The consultation has also moved this business from the halls of government, seen as independent from the Parliament and political parties, representatives of those parties which support it: in fact members of the Government (the individual ministers, deputy ministers and secretaries) are appointed logic divider (manual Cencelli) between the party leaders or representatives closely related to them. And so the individual ministries become the only area of \u200b\u200baction of the Minister, Deputy Minister and Secretary, whose principal concern becomes that of pleasing, thanks to the power that achieved the largest possible number of groups, organizations, committees, organizations and individuals, to ensure a good election result in his own party. Even these trades under the table are defined in consultation pompously. Amen.
Bruno Vespa once said with pride that his program was called the third branch of parliament. Had not noticed that its transmission, like other successful politician of entertainment have become the only true place for political debate, where politicians can really share his ideas and his projects. With the limit, however, that the television share does not confer any power of decision and the popular appreciation on any particular point under discussion need not end with the memory of the transmission, leaving, at most, a general feeling of sympathy toward this or that politician, with the 'effect desired, to move some votes in the election.
In essence, the Parliament and its Members do not need any more. The political debate takes place publicly, through the media, but it will do bait and switch, and thus to gain broad sympathy votes. The real decisions are made in "consultation" outside Parliament, directly between the leaders of parties and any social gathering evidence that it has enough following: the purpose is always the same, "move" votes.
by legnostorto.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment