of Barbara Di Salvo - As often happens when you add the suffix-ism and you go from reality to abstraction, from practice to theory change the result, and considerably worse. is that assistance, the noblest of human behavior, it becomes hopelessly in the caricature of the welfare state, no longer practical activity, but pure doctrine, no longer rational behavior, but what can be morale.Per dogma of the beasts, there is no human being is instinctively led to provide assistance to those who are in danger or necessità .Certo, some have a more heroic spirit, but even the worst of cynics, if not suffering from serious mental disorders, would starve a person dear to him, even his figlio.L 'only difference between the hero and the cynical is that the first also helps to strangers.
This is not the time to philosophize about why to do it, but Christianity is acknowledged to have provided a strong motivation to humans: the conquest of Paradiso.Ora, that we have marched over the clergy did not put in some debate, but to deny that Christians are, for purely religious reasons, more likely to give assistance to those in need seems to me quite frankly too much for even the most convinced that we can meet the atei.Non a Mother Teresa, a Padre Pio, the priest or the lady in the suburbs of San Vincenzo, who have dedicated their lives to help the prossimo.Ognuno of these believers will have had its reasons, but the merit of Christ and religions from his descendants have been able to convey the natural selfishness in altruistic behavior.
Selfishness, in fact, in these cases does not disappear, is channeled to the service of others, but the motivation of bottom is always selfish: the eternal salvation is only and exclusively of a single benefactor, mica beneficiato.Con this critic's certainly not altruistic Christians, indeed my hat off to those who invented them. I only claim what is profoundly wrong to demonize extol egoism and altruism, as the second without the first even exist. What has been invented, however, socialism and communism (two other-isms that make abstract, doctrinaire, dogmatic, and thus the worst two good concepts like socialization and communion)?
welfarism, selfless altruism, helping others without helping ourselves, or worse, making the male.Pura abstraction, simple demagoguery, tales for gullible people still believe that the help of the other may be imposed by law and the ego can be abolished for decreto.In somehow had to replace a religion and have made a new land where the only god is the need , the weak, the stranger, the poor who need help in any way, whatever the cost, whatever the conseguenze.Poco whether denying the selfishness at the root, rather than direct it as Christ did, you end up being a victim . One can not even believe in the devil, but the day before that if he finds, he plans to get away with saying "you do not exist"? And the results of such stupidity and shortsightedness are obvious to all. But they, no, do not give up.
still insist on the redistribution of income, with the uncontrolled social spending, indiscriminate with the acceptance of any derelict again destroy every resource of the country to live to make the selfish approfittatori.Questo contradict themselves because if they admitted that ' selfishness is not only rich but also poor in that if took the opportunity to live rendita.Così do not bother to help the needy out of poverty, but are happy to leave it, while continuing to satisfy their egos by the generous with our money and thus buy their consent. Thus the state, rather than facilitate social assistance carried out by individuals, whatever the motivation that drives them, to profit from religion, have the presumption to be able to do without these institutions, to be able to replace themselves and to become itself a religione.Ma yes, we remove the privileges of the Church , we pay the ICI to the speakers and Catholic schools. Enough with these gifts to the priests who have so many billions that could feed Africa. Applies to them also the European principles of free competition. That they also compete in the lucrative business of non-profit organization. Oh, I am told by the director of the non-profit organization that also do not pay the ICI. So where's the privilege? And community centers to pay? I doubt it since they are Okkupati and, therefore, does not even pay the rent. And receipts of bars and concerts that make us in are taxed? Even those? And all the cultural associations, sports clubs, and all those other organizations that deal with care, welfare, health, education, hospitality, culture, recreation and sport ? even theirs? So, no exemption is given only to the Church? "Ah, that is for all faiths? So, even mosques and cultural centers Tibetans?
But you look at it. No, not that. Too? I can not believe .... well as unions and political parties, I am treated as a non-profit non-profit? Come on, it's a joke. Party and union non-profit is a contradiction in termini.Ma is really the case? So want to say that unions such as the eyelashes, with 3,000 branches in Italy, the CISL and the UIL with 5,000, with a real estate portfolio of € 35 million, do not pay a cent of ICI? That same real estate corporate fascist state that is they literally got? The same properties that you do not even know the exact number, because the unions are not required to submit a budget that is invested billions they steal a pensioners, workers, INPS and State? Thus, the synthesis is in the name of an alleged anti-privilege, parties, friends of the unions, who invented the welfare state are trying to take away from those who support a tax exemption in their own benefit? Now that's unfair competition.
0 comments:
Post a Comment